Candace Owens Is Wrong About Trump And Treason

Candace Owens is making waves again—she recently accused President Trump of treason over his position on Israel and Gaza, framing it as a betrayal of “America First.” She used that charge in her episode with Tucker Carlson, and the clip is already stirring controversy. (See her podcast: Tucker Carlson and I Discuss Brigitte’s Genes & Trump Commits Treason) YouTube+1

But when you look at the actual policy, you see a different story—one of strategy, leverage, and bold negotiation.

The Trump Plan Is Public, Tough, and Strategic

In late September 2025, Trump unveiled a 20-point proposal for Gaza, crafted together with Israel’s Prime Minister Netanyahu. The plan demands an immediate ceasefire, the return of all hostages within 72 hours once accepted, phased Israeli withdrawal, a prisoner exchange, Hamas disarmament, and a transitional governance structure for Gaza that excludes Hamas control.

Trump gave Hamas a public window—three to four days—to accept or face serious consequences. Reuters+1 Netanyahu already pledged support for key portions of the plan. Reuters Negotiators in Egypt have begun indirect talks between Israel and Hamas under Egyptian/Qatari mediation. The Guardian+1

In short: this is not some secret backroom deal. It’s a high-stakes public diplomacy move.

Why This Is America First — Not Betrayal

Owens’ framing suggests that any compromise is weakness, but a strong America doesn’t demand unconditional war—it demands results. Let’s break down how this plan advances U.S. interests:

• Hostages Come Home First. The strongest moral and political claim is that no American is left behind.

• Prevent Endless War. A negotiated ceasefire is smarter than perpetual conflict draining our military and treasury.

• Neutralize Threats. Disarming Hamas and preventing them from rebuilding is central to long-term peace.

• Stabilize the Region. When Gaza is in upheaval, global energy, shipping, and diplomacy suffer—American households feel it too.

That is not treason. That is disciplined statecraft.

Online Drama Isn’t Reality

Yes, Candace is loud. Yes, she frames the narrative in dramatic terms. But political drama doesn’t define state policy.

Some right-wing observers have already warned of an “antisemitic meltdown” creeping into parts of the online right, a space prone to extremism and fear tactics. The fact that the attack on Trump comes from someone marketed as pro-conservative is telling. The leadership test is not which influencer makes the louder claim—it’s which policy delivers. The Guardian+2Axios+2

What the Talks on the Ground Reveal

In Sharm el-Sheikh, indirect negotiations are already underway. Hamas is reportedly discussing key hostage numbers. Israel is considering phased withdrawals tied to compliance from Hamas. The Guardian+2Axios+2

Hamas has accepted parts of the Trump proposal—namely, stopping the war, release of hostages, and withdrawal by Israel. But they are still vague on disarmament and final governance. Reuters

The contrast is stark: Trump’s plan is clear, public, and demanding; Hamas’ responses are cautious, conditional, and opaque.

Why “Treason” Doesn’t Fit

Calling this treason is a misuse of the word. Let’s measure:

• Trump isn’t hiding the plan. He published it.

• He isn’t siding with Hamas or abandoning Israel. The plan was rolled out with Netanyahu by his side.

• He isn’t weakening U.S. leverage—he’s structuring the deal so Hamas must comply or lose everything.

• He isn’t silencing debate—he’s presenting a choice on the global stage.

Candace is pushing fear, not analysis. She’s weaponizing doubt rather than engaging the policy. But the facts don’t back her claim.